Philosophical musings on a diverse variety of subjects.

"Chenango" is an old Indian word allegedly meaning "land of the bullthistle. Or so the traditional story has it. The bullthistle (Cirsium vulgare) is not native to North America; it was probably brought over from Europe. Nevertheless, we in Chenango County, New York, use it as our county logo. I am a Bullthistle Birder, a Bullthistle Botanizer, and a Bullthistle Hiker. With this blog I am now a Bullthistle Blogger.
For posts specific to Chenango County click these links.



Friday, January 27, 2012

THE CATACLYSMIC DELUSION OF SELF-CONTROL

Donald A. Windsor

My drawing, "The Cataclysmic Delusion Of Self-Control", was done with ballpoint pens on cardboard.










What appears to be two misshapen gears represents the futile attempts of the much smaller one to control the much larger, more complex one.  However, the teeth do not mesh and the larger one is about to topple over and knock the smaller one away.  The whole concept of self-control is precarious at best and ultimately cataclysmic.  Nevertheless, we continue struggling to try.


=====================================================

Tuesday, January 24, 2012

GENUINE ARTISTS

Donald A. Windsor

A genuine artist has "been driven since childhood", according to Raymond J. Steiner (1).  Upon reading his definition, I realized that I am a genuine artist.  I have been drawing and painting ever since I was a little kid.  My mother enrolled me in children's classes at the Art Institute in Chicago when I was six years old.  At the end of every class the teacher decorated the classroom walls with our works.  So, I can truthfully say that I once hung in the Art Institute.  I remained a frequent visitor to this great museum until I departed from Illinois at the age of 32. 

I am not only a genuine artist; I am a compulsive genuine artist.  I was thrown out of school in the sixth grade for passing my comic strips around during class, after repeated warnings not to.  In the Army, I faced severe military discipline for hanging my disrespectful cartoons on official bulletin boards; fortunately, I was never caught.  Back in the 1950s, before graffiti became widespread, my creative works appeared throughout the Chicago area.  I am a compulsive doodler and use fanciful scribbling as a form of meditation.  My current drawings use ballpoint pen on cardboard, because they are done while listening to lectures or pondering some subject I am researching.

Now I want to extend Steiner's brilliant definition further.  Genuine artists may or may not be professionals.  Artists who sell their works have to produce what customers will purchase.  Those of us who do not sell are free to produce whatever kind of art we want.  We enjoy pure freedom of expression. But, we do want to exhibit our works.  Several decades ago, I used to sneak my drawings into famous art museums (MOMA, Metropolitan, Philadelphia, etc.).  I even developed a kit of pins and tapes, so that I could attach my work to any kind of a surface.  I would return at least an hour later and find that my work was removed.  I even put a message on the back of every piece stating that "For more of these, contact me" and I left my name, address, and phone number.  No one ever did, nor was I ever arrested.

EXHIBITING

The exhibition system works against me.  Art shows are usually juried.  Entry is based on the opinions of jurors.  The jurors are invariably professional artists or art teachers.  They are, by definition, in tune with what the market or the academic world wants.  How then are they qualified to judge the works of non-professional, non-academic genuine artists?

They are not!  They are indeed admirably qualified to assess techniques and appraise prices, but they foster limited notions of creativity that exist in their professional world.  They do not seem to recognize what some of us genuine artists realize is creative. 

I recommend that the jurors of art shows at least allow some token integration, an affirmative action.  Admit a few of us outcast genuine artists.  Let the world see what kind of art goes on outside of the jurors' gated communities.  I dare them.  Surely they are not afraid of us?  Or are they?

Anyone disagreeing with me might argue that compulsive behavior in a self-proclaimed artist does not necessarily produce good art.  I certainly agree.  But what does "good art" look like?

ART AND SCIENCE

I am a biologist, so my concept of art lies in the distinction between science and art.  Scientists strive to describe reality.  Artists strive to express their reactions to reality.  Good art, in this sense, is a faithful expression of personal reactions.  Personal reactions to reality are easy to produce but are very difficult to convey.  Different viewers may perceive expressions differently.  Good art must succeed at conveying expressions of reactions.

ART AND CRAFT

A painting of a bluebird must accurately capture what a bluebird actually looks like, in order to be a scientific illustration.  For a bluebird painting to be art, it has to leap into a metaphor.  The same painting can be both.  Or not.  A scientific illustration that does not leap into a metaphor is a craft.  Art is a craft that leaps into a metaphor.  The concept of metaphor gets bandied around but I adhere to its original meaning.  "Meta" means beyond and "-phor" means bearer; a metaphor bears something beyond what the craft itself presents.

Works that are untitled are merely crafts.  Titles assist viewers to uncover the metaphors.  If the artists themselves cannot think of their own titles, it is evident that they did not think enough about their works to embed them with metaphors.  Jurors are admirably suited to assess and appraise crafts.  However, I wonder about their capabilities to recognize metaphors.

Juried art shows are mostly exhibits of crafts.  Don't believe me?  At your next visit to a juried art show, stand in front of every work and ask yourself, "What is the metaphor?"  Then calculate the percent of the works that leap into metaphors.

CONCLUSION

As a compulsive genuine artist, I create my own art and ignore professional and academic trends.  The result is that I have great difficulty getting a chance to exhibit.  Consequently, I encourage some art shows to not be juried, or to at least have an non-juried component.

My art expresses my personal reactions to reality. I reserve my accurate descriptions of reality to my scientific research.  For a sample of my drawings on a PDF file, request it from me at windsorda@roadrunner.com

Art is a craft that leaps into a metaphor.  All untitled works are crafts.

Sometimes I think that being a compulsive genuine artist is a curse.  But only sometimes!


1.  Steiner, Raymond J.  Peeks & Piques!  Art Times 2011 November-December; 28(3): 2.

===============================================

Friday, January 6, 2012

BIOCARTELS AS MEMBERSHIP MATRICES

Donald A. Windsor

The biocartels of two host species, the American Robin (Turdus migratorius) and the European Starling (Sternus vulgaris), were compared and expressed in a  membership matrix.  Both bird species share similar habitats in North America.  However, the starling is cosmopolitan and has more parasites.  The biocartels were limited to symbionts that are parasites.

The robin had 106 parasite species and the starling had 171.  Of the total of 277 parasite species, the robin had 38.3% and the starling had 61.7%.  Forty parasite species were shared by both bird host species, so the distribution was 66 parasite species unique to the robin (27.8%), 40 parasite species shared (16.9%), and 131 parasite species unique to the starling (55.3%).

Membership matrices have two advantages.  They can accommodate many biocartels for comparison and they can be treated mathematically.

The full article was published in the
Archives of the SciAesthetics Institute 2012 January; 12(12): 1-14.
A copy is available from Donald A. Windsor, PO Box 604, Norwich NY 13815 for the breakeven price of $3.00, which includes postage.


===============================================